To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem with Mono is MS. I will never touch Mono because MS could, if they wanted, stop the project cold. I have said this before, while Mono may be a cool language/framework most people see the specter of MS overshadowing it. So they say "Mono is cool, but..." and that is where they will stand because the legal issues are not at all clear.
And yet Redhat, with their history of extreme caution, has decided that mono will ship on Fedora.
As referenced on another article on osnews, this is why: http://gregdek.livejournal.com/4008.html
I doubt very much this will change your mind of course.
Well, for one, the subject "Lamers", seems like flamebait.
Second, Microsoft has their own C# codebase that's ready to go, it would be a whole lot easier for them to make it cross platform than support two completely separate implementations, of which one was incomplete. Not to mention the fact that they don't want to be seen supporting an external project, nor do they want to cause any fuss by appearing to interfere in an external project. Thus your comment didn't make a whole lot of sense.
Then there's the fact that it seems unnecessary to criticise someone for trying something even if, at first glance, it appears redundant (though in this case, their approach is clearly better).





Member since:
2005-07-08
Why do they come up with this now?!
We got mono on the mac, and imagine it's oss - you can tune it what you want it too.