Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 27th Mar 2006 19:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 108796
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
That is a ridiculous statement. FUD-head. Some people stand on their own principles and some people hold principles that they demand and deserve privacy in their personal matters.
I am not so 100% inclined to be that way so I don't really mind so much, but some people are. Eugenia's question [I am guessing] was not meant to be a jab but a general question to all maybe better rephrased as "if you have sensitive data, personal data that you do not EVER want to be revealed, then steer away from such things, otherwise use them"... in other words, she was saying "ask yourself the question........"