To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, MS _did_ write the malware, sort of. They decided not to care about security at a time where security at home was very new and obviously needed (1997),
MS has for years failed to try to raise the security level. Only _after_ XP was released has MS begun a somewhat decent policy on security. But it's still a joke compared with other OS'es (apart from hobby OS'es in early development).
Yes, Microsoft is at fault for creating insecure systems which are very difficult to secure.
A) There is no start up in Linux.
You are clueless. It's called INIT.
B) Did MS write the malware? NO.
That's why I said negligence. Look up the definition.
That would be like saying it's Boeing's fault that a 747 got hijacked.
No it's nothing like that. Actually that might even be the worst analogy I have ever heard.






Member since:
2005-07-07
There are no impossible-to-detect rootkits for Linux? ;-)
Show me one Linux PC swamped with malware. Point me in the direction of Linux malware that installs itself into startup. Please show me the magic of making files executable in linux without chmod. After you accomplish that maybe, just maybe I will concede that Microsoft has nothing to do with the malware problems Windows users face today.