Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Apr 2006 20:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 111578
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-12
They integrate things and thus make a bad product, like iPhoto, it's 3 apps, an organizer, and editor, and a viewer
iPhoto is a photo organizer. Editing and viewing are its secondary functions. iPhoto provides basic editing capabilities, so that you can avoid firing up photoshop just to rotate a picture. Viewing, on the other hand, is an essential component of an organizer (everyone expects thumbnails, slideshows etc. from an organizer).
Apple messed up Aperture the same way by forcing a library/orginizer on people.
Aperture is mainly used to streamline a photographer's digital workflow. While it does have more editing functions compared to iPhoto, they are basic adjustments. For heavy lifting, you need to export to photoshop. Aperture is mainly used for its versioning and tagging functions.
Edited 2006-04-05 03:14