Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 9th Apr 2006 18:10 UTC, submitted by Jack Dawson
Thread beginning with comment 113155
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: is it really that big a deal?
by porcel on Sun 9th Apr 2006 19:26
in reply to "is it really that big a deal?"
KDE is not a window manager and Kubuntu was born out of necessity, because plenty of people, Linus included, cannot get their work done on Gnome.
For many of us, it's simply too restricting, lacks too many of the fundamentals applications (see KDE-edu or the many utilities (Kdirstat, kreplace and lacks the sort of integrated development environment that KDE is praised and known for.
But let's not turn this into an endless gnome vs. kde thread. That's not what this thread is about. The fact that KDE was so well recieved and that Mark himself welcomed it tells you that it was very much needed and not just born out of some whimsical decision.
RE: is it really that big a deal?
by segedunum on Sun 9th Apr 2006 19:29
in reply to "is it really that big a deal?"
RE[2]: is it really that big a deal?
by pinky on Sun 9th Apr 2006 21:26
in reply to "RE: is it really that big a deal?"
RE[3]: is it really that big a deal?
by CVDpr on Mon 10th Apr 2006 02:31
in reply to "RE: is it really that big a deal?"




Member since:
2005-08-20
I have a hard time being concerned about this. Making another distro for the sake of using a different wm is silly. Why can't they just work on kde support for ubuntu, even if it's not an option by default. I'm sure most people setting up kubuntu for themselves these days would be plenty capable of using a package manager to install kde.