Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 9th Apr 2006 18:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 113243
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Free Speech and fanatics
by ronaldst on Sun 9th Apr 2006 21:38
in reply to "RE: Free Speech and fanatics"
RE[2]: Free Speech and fanatics
by AndyZ on Sun 9th Apr 2006 21:50
in reply to "RE: Free Speech and fanatics"
Yes, but english may not be my first language so perhaps I had some trouble expressing what I wanted to say. But coming form Germany I have a very clear understanding what both racism and fascims means.
Statistics! Dont make me laugh! Fearmongering and promting intolerance more like it. Dont trust satistical data that you didnt make up yourself.
As I said before: This is a tech site and so dubiously argumentation should not be used.
AndyZ
RE[2]: Free Speech and fanatics
by Budd on Mon 10th Apr 2006 12:12
in reply to "RE: Free Speech and fanatics"





Member since:
2005-06-29
Both Fortuyn and van Gogh where neofascist dicriminating people because of thier race and religion.
Wowow, be careful there. Fascists? Look up that word to see what it means, before you use it. Rascism? Maybe, but is pointing out mere statistical facts (namely, that Islam women are more prone to abuse by their husbands (Van Gogh) or that relatively speaking foreigners commit more crimes (Fortuyn) racism?
Remember, for instance, that Fortuyn was a homosexual, and that he actually wanted to pardon the 26000 illegal immigrants currently in the Netherlands-- contrary to our current government, who wants to throw them all out.
Look, I wasn't fan of the two either-- but you should really know what you are talking about before incorrectly using terms such as 'fascist' or 'racist'.