Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Apr 2006 21:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 113770
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-06
If Nero for Linux had the same functionality as Nero for Windows, it would be bought more often, but it isn't and thus most consumers don't get any added value by buying it.
I doubt it. There are too many free alternatives for Linux that allready are better than Nero for windows.
The problem for Nero is that they got too late to the market. If they had been present on the Linux market earlier there would have been less incentive to develop good free programs like K3b.