To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Qt has its own problens though--the biggest one being its licensing requirements.
I would love everything to be free, but unfortunately it just isn't going to happen. Good development tools require time and investment, and that money has to come from somewhere.
The extremely high cost of a cross platform Qt license effectively locks out smaller shops who are just trying to get started.
Ahhh, the mythical small development shops. The vast majority of small development companies develop for Windows, and they spend a hell of a lot more on development tools and software than a handful of Qt licenses.
> The vast majority of small development
> companies develop for Windows, and they spend a
> hell of a lot more on development tools and
> software than a handful of Qt licenses.
Actually, the vast majority of small development shops spend little or nothing on development tools cause they use open open source tools. And the ones that do spend money? Well, Visual Studio.NET Enterprise edition is less than 1/6th the cost of a cross platform Qt license.
So no, the vast majority of small shops do not spend anywhere near the amount of money that Qt costs on development tools.







Member since:
2005-10-08
> Till then, the best we can do if we need to be cross platform is
> probably using QT.
Qt has its own problens though--the biggest one being its licensing requirements. The extremely high cost of a cross platform Qt license effectively locks out smaller shops who are just trying to get started. And the alternative (licesning all your stuff under GPL) just isn't feasable sometimes.