Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Apr 2006 21:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 113801
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
After years of trying, no one has yet been able to create a practical Linux virus. Rootkits, yes, viruses, no. Or have I missed something?
It's impossible to write a practical Linux virus, as the marketshare is so little it would never spread. A cross-platform virus has more potential, but the added pay-off in exchange for a massive jump in complexity and thus buggyness and detectability wouldn't be worth it.
However, to infect Linux files, it's simply a matter of infecting Windows, loading the appropiate filesystemdriver (ext2 driver for windows is available, ext3/reiser not, and fat could be used for shared files), infecting the right files, and setting permissions right. Trivial is otherwise of course
PS: hardly anyone writes viruses these days. Any self-replicating code these days is simply a worm. To infect Linux systems undetectably code-inserting will be necessary however.