Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Apr 2006 18:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 114235
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-09-27
Your argument is moot. By not devoting endless amounts of money and manpower into porting a product to a platform you have never extrinsically supported in the past, you automatically "want to kill it"? To extend your simple views, any company who doesn't port their application for Windows to Linux wants to "kill Linux"? I'm not saying Microsoft doesn't want to "kill Linux"; in fact, I'm sure Steve Ballmer has detailed his wish to "kill Linux" strewn with colourful language many times in the past. Scope of support is hardly an indicator of a company's most extreme intent. If I release a piece of software but cannot afford to support it, do I whole-heartedly want to kill it? Think before you post.