To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
We know in American elections that someone will be elected in 4 or 8 years. No one is debating it because there have not been any potential candidates named for office 8 years in the future.
We know that MS will put out a product sometime in the future, but the difference is the MS has already named the candidates and the proposed time line for those candidates to give us something to debate.
All that comes from MS trying to get their resellers, developers, system builders etc to believe they have a focused and well thought out plan for the future. Even though we all know that they wait for the next hot thing to happen then jump on it. (Like they did with IE, Windows media player, .Net etc) That has been all they have done in the last 10 years after the release of Windows 95 (Which was their biggest triumph)
Game systems get hot, MS is there, Ipods get hot, MS is there, Web TV gets hot for a minute, MS is there, Google gets hot, MS is there, Ajax gets hot, MS is there, DVR's get hot, MS is there. Everything someone else does in the tech space that looks like a trend MS tries to get on the band wagon. They now do 100 different things and none of them great! No focus at all.




Member since:
2005-08-20
I believe that it is possible to be a little too obsessed with future release schedules. For crap's sake, debating about a release schedule two versions after the product that's not even been released yet? When's the next American election coming? Who's debating who's gonna get elected 8 years after that?
From the article:
Will pushing back Vista's release-to-manufacturing date by a few weeks or months play havoc with these already tentative schedules?
Sounds like the author is praying for Microsoft to fail and believes that if she wishes it hard enough, it might come true :roll;