Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Apr 2006 21:17 UTC, submitted by Benedikt Meurer
Xfce The Xfce project has released the first beta in the 4.4 release cycle. "Xfce 4.4 beta1 ( is now available for download. Xfce 4.4 features new tools such as the much anticipated 'Thunar' file manager as well as several huge improvements of its core components."
Thread beginning with comment 115932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Thunar
by Tom K on Tue 18th Apr 2006 15:10 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Thunar"
Tom K
Member since:

How does the manner in which the parent made his comments change the facts at all? A lot of GNOME/KDE distros like to use huge fonts.

I suspect it's because Linux's/X's/whatever font smoothing really sucks for small fonts, and the devs know this, and they're just covering it up by using big fonts.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Thunar
by negativity on Tue 18th Apr 2006 15:52 in reply to "RE[4]: Thunar"
negativity Member since:

Fonts size:

I believe it's a change of perspective. When Windows was created, you would see definitions of 640x480, 800x600.

Nowadays, you will find definitions of 1600x1400 or more. Really, some guys use huge definitions.

If Linux sets the font sizes to the sizes of the fonts of Windows, it will be for backward compatibility with what was standard years or decades ago.

Also, Linux snobs in this regard, due to the support of layout managers in the GUIs of Linux. So one can increase/decrease the font size as much as ones likes it.

I generally dislike the fonts on Windows and KDE.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: Thunar
by Tom K on Tue 18th Apr 2006 18:53 in reply to "RE[5]: Thunar"
Tom K Member since:

The average resolution now seems to be 1024x768, and such fonts are simply too big for that resolution.

And there is no easy way to change the default font size in GTK+ applications system-wide. You have to create a config file that you stick somewhere in /usr/lib that over-rides the font sizes. Stupid, stupid design.

Reply Parent Score: 1