Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Apr 2006 21:17 UTC, submitted by Benedikt Meurer
Xfce The Xfce project has released the first beta in the 4.4 release cycle. "Xfce 4.4 beta1 (4.3.90.1) is now available for download. Xfce 4.4 features new tools such as the much anticipated 'Thunar' file manager as well as several huge improvements of its core components."
Thread beginning with comment 116003
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Thunar
by Tom K on Tue 18th Apr 2006 18:53 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Thunar"
Tom K
Member since:
2005-07-06

The average resolution now seems to be 1024x768, and such fonts are simply too big for that resolution.

And there is no easy way to change the default font size in GTK+ applications system-wide. You have to create a config file that you stick somewhere in /usr/lib that over-rides the font sizes. Stupid, stupid design.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: Thunar
by negativity on Tue 18th Apr 2006 19:25 in reply to "RE[6]: Thunar"
negativity Member since:
2006-02-23

Windows is so old that if we digged in it we could find petroleum. :-)

Joking. :-)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Thunar
by Tom K on Tue 18th Apr 2006 19:33 in reply to "RE[7]: Thunar"
Tom K Member since:
2005-07-06

Thanks, that was quite relevant to the discussion.

It enlightened me.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: Thunar
by JMcCarthy on Tue 18th Apr 2006 20:01 in reply to "RE[6]: Thunar"
JMcCarthy Member since:
2005-08-12

"And there is no easy way to change the default font size in GTK+ applications system-wide. You have to create a config file that you stick somewhere in /usr/lib that over-rides the font sizes."

wroooooooooooooong.

"The average resolution now seems to be 1024x768, and such fonts are simply too big for that resolution"

The fonts are entirely resonable. They're Sans 10 by default. The problem is gargantuan toolbars & icons. Which is easily fixed.

Edited 2006-04-18 20:06

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Thunar
by Tom K on Tue 18th Apr 2006 20:23 in reply to "RE[7]: Thunar"
Tom K Member since:
2005-07-06

Ah, sorry ...

/usr/share/themes/THEMENAME/gtk-2.0/gtkrc

Equally as bad. And how can you say that http://thunar.xfce.org/images/filewindow-4.png is 10-point Sans, or that it's "entirely reasonable"?

Sorry, but I don't need retard-size fonts. At least when OS X uses larger fonts, they look decent. These ones are skinny and lack any kind of definition.

Reply Parent Score: 1