Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 18th Apr 2006 17:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 116130
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: My answer is YES
by sappyvcv on Tue 18th Apr 2006 22:28
in reply to "RE[7]: My answer is YES"
RE[9]: My answer is YES
by cr8dle2grave on Tue 18th Apr 2006 22:35
in reply to "RE[8]: My answer is YES"
Which brings me to my point: it's about user expectations, not hardware support.
Mac user's don't expect their Mac to support every periphereal under the sun, so why should Linux users expect the same? I surmise that actual Linux users don't actually, that point of view is one that is usually espoused by Windows users when giving reasons for why they won't switch to Linux. Which, for what it's worth, I consider to be a perfectly valid reason.
It's not a lack of hardware support which holding back Linux on the desktop, but the expectation of some potential users that Linux be a seemless drop in replacement for Windows.





Member since:
2005-07-11
Linux supports far more hardware out of the box than a Mac ever will.