Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 18th Apr 2006 17:49 UTC
Linux Efforts to bring glitzy new graphics to Linux are fueling an old conflict: Does proprietary software belong in open-source Linux? The issue involves software modules called drivers, which plug into the kernel at the heart of the open-source operating system. Drivers let software communicate with hardware such as network adapters, hard drives and video cards.
Thread beginning with comment 116281
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: no non-free in my kernel
by kaiwai on Wed 19th Apr 2006 07:27 UTC
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

So think twice before you say, "OOHHH.. I don't care! Give me binary-only so I can use my shiny new nvidia card." We should instead say, "No, I won't buy nvidia until they release an open-source card" because that is the only way to put pressure on vendors to provide real support for their hardware in linux.<?i>

The fact is, it isn't just that simple; what about me using FreeBSD? should I be left out in the cold? Lets compare; you have FreeBSD which is a since to maintain for given that it has a stable API, stable compiler for longer periods than Linux etc. The problem of bad hardware support isn't just a linux problem, but a problem for all those who use alternative operating systems.

As for boycotting Nvidia/ATI or some other company, it'll make little inroads because as end users we only make up a small percentage compared to the over 100million PC's that are pre-loaded with Windows and equiped with the latest and greatest video cards.

The alternative is to create an opensource graphics card; possibly using an existing, already opened up graphics specification - say the Matrox G550, as a starting point, then work up from there; but it would require major sponsorship by Novell, Red Hat, SUN and other players to get it through to production and a usable product.

Reply Score: 2