Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 18th Apr 2006 17:49 UTC
Linux Efforts to bring glitzy new graphics to Linux are fueling an old conflict: Does proprietary software belong in open-source Linux? The issue involves software modules called drivers, which plug into the kernel at the heart of the open-source operating system. Drivers let software communicate with hardware such as network adapters, hard drives and video cards.
Thread beginning with comment 116490
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Consider two questions:
by ganloo on Thu 20th Apr 2006 06:08 UTC
Member since:

1. Will the proprietary drivers really enhance the experience of "out-of-box"?
I don't think so.
2. Will the drivers that go to open source bring more qualification? Saying ATI or via?
maybe, it will give more feeling of freedom, but not the quilification I am afraid.
So I think the keypoint is CHOICE. Do the hardware ventors have the choice? (if there Linux kernel refuses the non-GPL compatible drivers, does it matter if giving a interface, is it technically difficult?) Do the end users have the choice (if we just can't make use of ALGLX with ATI proprietary driver under Linux)?
I like open source and use Archlinux daily, but I also expect I can get a 3d accelerated desktop more easily.

Reply Score: 1