Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Apr 2006 17:40 UTC
Windows Vista is all the rage at the moment (and now even the Sunday Eve Column is about it). I don't think there's a single piece of beta software that has ever been discussed as much as Windows Vista. Obviously this makes sense, since Windows powers roughly 95% of the world's desktop computers; hence an update to that system will surely spark some heavy debates. Personally, I'm indifferent towards Vista. Read on for why.
Thread beginning with comment 117452
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well thom..
by sappyvcv on Sun 23rd Apr 2006 18:10 UTC
sappyvcv
Member since:
2005-07-06

They *are* developing a new OS in research, and I know you know that ;) What comes of it remains to be seen.

RE: Well thom..
by hobgoblin on Sun 23rd Apr 2006 18:27 in reply to "Well thom.."
hobgoblin Member since:
2005-07-06

hard to tell realy. only thing that i have picked up so far is that its using managed code for the whole system (iirc).

still, that could make backwards compatiblity simpler. in that when a program askes for a old interface, it will be handed over to a special sandbox where it can go nuts. but if it dies, nothing will happen to the rest of the system...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE: Well thom..
by rayiner on Sun 23rd Apr 2006 19:05 in reply to "Well thom.."
rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

There are lots of new OSs being developed in research. There is no reason to believe that any more willc ome out of Singularity than has come out of all the other research OSs that have preceded it. The only reason Microsoft exists today is because of backwards compatibility. Without the enormous market advantages of application compatibility, Microsoft never would've made it through the 1990s. Without application compatibility, Microsoft is nothing, and they know that. They'll never field an OS that isn't compatibile with the vast body of Windows software that exists.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE: Well thom..
by kaiwai on Mon 24th Apr 2006 05:10 in reply to "Well thom.."
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes, we all know about singularity; and like all R&D things, this was mearly a proof of concept; a rectum pluck along the lines of 'what would we do, if we could design something from scratch'.

Why not base a new operating system off Plan9? I mean, it corrects all the problems and limitations of UNIX; tries some new things; it would be simply a matter of Microsoft fixing up the GUI, and voila, you have the problem solved with minimum fuss.

Deploy it first as a server OS, then gradually start to sell it as a client operating system as new programmes come on board; backwards compatibility can be done via VirtualPC.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Well thom..
by sappyvcv on Mon 24th Apr 2006 13:56 in reply to "Well thom.."
sappyvcv Member since:
2005-07-06

Okay then.. *why* exactly was this voted down?

I think it would be nice if someone was assigned to verify votes, to try to clean this place up a bit.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0