Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Apr 2006 14:05 UTC, submitted by CrimsonScythe
Thread beginning with comment 117759
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-12
Again somebody unable to get the difference between price and value.
E. g. product comparison between the MacBookPro 15" and other 15" CoreDuo laptops by c't showed that the display of the Mac was better e. g. almost all laptop except the Mac laked non-reflecting coating making the displays unusable in bright sunlight. In fact, the Apple laptop was one of the best in almost all categories (battery time, weight, thickness, features, software)
Don't get me wrong: The HP dv8000t 17" maight be a good laptop - I don't know - but stupid spec listings with the usual price comparision at the end are way to simplistic for the real world. Furthermore the iron rule of price comparisons states, that there is alway a cheaper machine.
In that sense:
The computing world isn't waiting around for HP to sell them overpriced x86 boxes.
HP is not in the market for the cheapest machines, you say? Well - neither is Apple ..