Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 29th Apr 2006 12:35 UTC
Mac OS X Apparantly, Apple is interested in porting Sun Solaris' ZFS to Mac OS X. From the zfs-discuss mailinglist: "Chris Emura, the Filesystem Development Manager within Apple's CoreOS organization is interested in porting ZFS to OS X. For more information, please e-mail him directly at [email address]. Speaking for the zfs team (at Sun), this is great news and we fully support the effort."
Thread beginning with comment 119450
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Great news
by suryad on Sat 29th Apr 2006 16:10 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Great news"
suryad
Member since:
2005-07-09

God I hate NTFS and its defragging problem. Try a little experiment. Defrag your computer and I mean offline and online defrag. Then reboot, you will see your computer boot fast in less than 20 seconds....well mine does anyway....reboot 3-4 more times and watch your boot times grow longer and longer as the disk gets more fragmented because of all the I/O that is being done. That is the single biggest problem I have....is fragmentation with NTFS.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Great news
by JackMayhoff on Sat 29th Apr 2006 16:25 in reply to "RE[4]: Great news"
JackMayhoff Member since:
2006-04-27

Are you sure thats not the prefetching optimisaton on XP?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Great news
by elsewhere on Sat 29th Apr 2006 16:33 in reply to "RE[4]: Great news"
elsewhere Member since:
2005-07-13

God I hate NTFS and its defragging problem. Try a little experiment. Defrag your computer and I mean offline and online defrag. Then reboot, you will see your computer boot fast in less than 20 seconds....well mine does anyway....reboot 3-4 more times and watch your boot times grow longer and longer as the disk gets more fragmented because of all the I/O that is being done. That is the single biggest problem I have....is fragmentation with NTFS.

I'm going totally OT here, but from my past experience with 2K/XP, wiping the swap and then setting it to a fixed size after a defrag helps a lot with this problem. Windows will create the swap in a contiguous space so it doesn't become fragmented, helps with a quicker bootup and slightly better performance overall.

But you're right, defragging ntfs is a PITA.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[6]: Great news
by cfrankb on Sat 29th Apr 2006 21:49 in reply to "RE[5]: Great news"
cfrankb Member since:
2006-01-03

Regarding a fixed swap to prevent disk slowing due to fragmentation and/or resizing, for those with 2GB of RAM fix the swap size at 0.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Great news
by Tom K on Sat 29th Apr 2006 20:35 in reply to "RE[4]: Great news"
Tom K Member since:
2005-07-06

A disk won't get fragmented just because of I/O going on. It will get fragmented if you're appending to files after you've consolidated all of your free space (and packed the files in close to each other).

I call bullshit on this test, as I deal with 3-4 PCs getting benchmarked every day, and fragmentation only goes up minimally (ie. 3%) every few days.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3