Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st May 2006 15:31 UTC
"In this mini-writeup, we will be discussing from a fairly objective position how Internet Explorer 7 now stands compared to the latest offerings from it's biggest competitors: Firefox and Opera. This isn't a comparison, there will be no 'winner', not in this article at any rate!"
Thread beginning with comment 119892
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-11-15
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-06-29
I don't know that I can even finish. The review is filled with the typical wet-noodle "everyone is competing and we win" crap that all the reviews have.
.
Then he goes on to make spelling errors such as:
"No matter how many computer techies or script-kiddies or hackers out there no how great a product is"
Sure, it's a blog, but come on, don't call names and make spelling errors in one sentence...
Firefox blends to its environment, I can't believe a reviewer is actually saying that's a bad default... It's like the default of all defaults
I would like to mention to the author that the way a program looks is not its interface, it's its look. The interface was covered correctly in everything but firefox.
Since when did the Mozilla Foundation claim 10% market share for Firefox? I believe independent "studies" have said that, and others have said 8 and 7 and 9 and 11 and 15, etc.
This review is shallow, often wrong, useless, and badly written.