Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd May 2006 16:11 UTC
Mac OS X The recent ruckus about the claimed growing vulnerability of Mac OSX from certain sources has caused an indignant outcry from Mac advocates who claim the stories are mostly media hype. According to an expert in Unix and Linux systems, the outcry is not without justification. Con Zymaris has been working with Unix systems for nearly three decades and for the past 15 years has been running a consultancy on open source software implementation. Zymaris says that, while it is true that a Mac can get infected with a virus, it is not easy and it is not likely to cause much damage. What's more, Mac users don't need to install firewalls and anti-virus software.
Thread beginning with comment 120703
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Anti-FUD is still FUD
by twenex on Wed 3rd May 2006 20:43 UTC in reply to "Anti-FUD is still FUD"
twenex
Member since:
2006-04-21

Is there even any anti-virus software for OS X (that doesn't just deal with Windows viruses?)

Also, if you have a firewall between you and your internet connection, there's no need for EVERY computer to have one.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Pseudo Cyborg Member since:
2005-07-09

There is, but they're not nearly as "vast" as the Windows ones.

You're right. I should have been more clear. Every computer should be behind one.

Not many homes have a network, though, which is why I worded it the way I had, but thanks for pointing that out.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Anti-FUD is still FUD
by twenex on Wed 3rd May 2006 20:52 in reply to "RE[3]: Anti-FUD is still FUD"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

Not many homes have a network, though, which is why I worded it the way I had, but thanks for pointing that out.

You're welcome, and that's true enough. I guess I'm just too used to using routers to avoid USB ADSL modems!

Edited 2006-05-03 20:53

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Anti-FUD is still FUD
by GStepper on Thu 4th May 2006 13:14 in reply to "RE[2]: Anti-FUD is still FUD"
GStepper Member since:
2006-03-08

Also, if you have a firewall between you and your internet connection, there's no need for EVERY computer to have one.

Well, I'm sorry but I don't agree because if you don't use a firewall per host then you'll someday have troubles on your LAN...

A so-called admin in the company I work for told me exactly the same thing and it wasn't hard to prove him wrong. Consider the fact that we have laptop users who work from their home or wherever they want, once they get a virus/trojan/spyware/you name it and that the laptop is plugged on the LAN again, then the firewall at the "entrance" of the LAN won't protect ANY of the other hosts on the LAN. Firewall is a must have for EVERY host that's connected onto a network, it's that simple ! Do you think it's by coicidence that EVERY major OSes provide a firewall?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2