Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 6th May 2006 17:01 UTC, submitted by Phoronix
3D News, GL, DirectX "We have been overwhelmed with requests to take a serious look at the frame-rate performance differences between the various open-source and proprietary contenders. Our first article on this topic, which will likely be the first of a series of examinations, is looking at the differences between the X.Org open-source ATI Radeon driver and that of ATI's official but proprietary fglrx display driver."
Thread beginning with comment 121685
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Very few games for linux
by msundman on Sat 6th May 2006 20:13 UTC in reply to "Very few games for linux"
Member since:

> The author said in the article that there is no point to
> open source the 3d driver for linux because there are
> very few games on that platform.

Why would anyone make 3D games for GNU/Linux when there are no decent graphics drivers for it?

Reply Parent Score: 5

BluenoseJake Member since:

Why would anyone write decent drivers for GNU/Linux when there are few 3d games for it? A chicken and the egg problem, me thinks

Reply Parent Score: 1

leech Member since:

Games aren't the only thing that requires 3D, as others have said, Maya, Softimage, etc all have Linux versions as well. Not to mention a lot of scientific uses for 3D imagery (astronomy programs as one example)

Reply Parent Score: 1