To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Blah...
All operating systems running on x86 suffer from hardware vulnerabilities on the x86-platform. It takes a moron to believe otherwise.
Windows does not suffer from this particular X Server bug because Windows does not use the X Server. It has a similar solution, but it isn't the X Server.
However, one cannot conclude on that background that Windows isn't vulnerable to hardware bugs.
[EDIT:] But yes to the first poster. It's nice to see article submissions like this one. More of those, please
Edited 2006-05-11 18:11
All operating systems running on x86 suffer from hardware vulnerabilities on the x86-platform. It takes a moron to believe otherwise.
No, it takes a moron to think this is x86 bug, when in fact it is an OS-level design flaw.
Windows does not suffer from this particular X Server bug because Windows does not use the X Server.
Windows does not suffer from this particular design flaw because it denies any user-mode (ring3) PIO access via EFLAGS.IOPL field. X Server is just an example - it could be any other app.
However, one cannot conclude on that background that Windows isn't vulnerable to hardware bugs.
I never claimed it wasn't. This is not a hardware bug.
Edited 2006-05-11 18:27
It's not an X Server bug, it's an exploit that takes advantage of an "unprotected" x86 CPU mode. Due to NT not allowing ring 3 code to access PIO privileges, there is no way to modify the SMI handler -- that the researcher currently knows about.
So in reality, no, not all operating systems on x86 suffer from hardware vulnerabilities on the x86-platform. If the OS doesn't provide the facilities to make the attack possible, that's the same as saying that that OS is "safe".





Member since:
2005-12-03
Apparently Windows is the only OS that is NOT vulnerable, so you won't see much of a discussion either.
http://www.cansecwest.com/slides06/csw06-duflot.ppt
Slide #41
So what's up with the oh-so-secure OpenBSD, huh Theo? Installing rootkit in 10 lines of code, LOL.
Edited 2006-05-11 18:00