To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
People have an option. They have the option to pay more for an nVidia/ATI board to gain something they don't need in the first place.
Intel graphics are good enough for most people's needs. They're even more than enough to run a fully accelerated X desktop.
Oh, now that's a level of arrogance I'm not letting slide.
Anyone who does 3d, or even 2d, graphics work, needs hardware acceleration (and color profile support, but that's another rant).
It is not your right, nor the GPL's, to tell ME what I do, or do not need, to use my computer effectively.
And certainly, it's not your right to tell me to stop using AMD cpu's. Ok-- I'll be fair. I'm sure there are standalone Intel GPU's out there with PCI-X connectors. I never looked.
It's becoming more apparent in the last 3 months, that the GPL isn't about "Free Software", the GPL is about restricting what people can, and cannot, do with software licensed under it, even to the point of attempting to punish commercial vendors.
Apparently, the "option" you refer to is that people use an OS such as Windows, or OSX, if they're doing anything other than programming with their computer.





Member since:
2005-07-06
"Most popular choice"? Only because 99% of people are not given a choice when they buy a new Dell/HP.
I don't think anyone here would willingly choose Intel integrated graphics if they had the option of that vs. an NVIDIA/ATI card.