Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 14th May 2006 15:02 UTC, submitted by Matthew Oliver
GNU, GPL, Open Source "We have received an email claiming that the Kororaa Xgl Live CD is in violation of the GPL. I have been researching this as much as I can, asking many prominent people in the Linux world for their opinion. So far, no-one has agreed with the email, however a few have said to seek legal advice, which I cannot afford to do (but can't afford not to do, if I want to continue the Live CD). As such, the Live CD has been put on hold, until I can sort this out. If I cannot sort this out I will be forced to cease work on the Xgl Live CD."
Thread beginning with comment 124635
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: random topic ;)
by thebluesgnr on Sun 14th May 2006 21:58 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: random topic ;)"
thebluesgnr
Member since:
2005-11-14

People have an option. They have the option to pay more for an nVidia/ATI board to gain something they don't need in the first place.

Intel graphics are good enough for most people's needs. They're even more than enough to run a fully accelerated X desktop.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: random topic ;)
by grat on Sun 14th May 2006 22:27 in reply to "RE[6]: random topic ;)"
grat Member since:
2006-02-02

People have an option. They have the option to pay more for an nVidia/ATI board to gain something they don't need in the first place.

Intel graphics are good enough for most people's needs. They're even more than enough to run a fully accelerated X desktop.


Oh, now that's a level of arrogance I'm not letting slide.

Anyone who does 3d, or even 2d, graphics work, needs hardware acceleration (and color profile support, but that's another rant).

It is not your right, nor the GPL's, to tell ME what I do, or do not need, to use my computer effectively.

And certainly, it's not your right to tell me to stop using AMD cpu's. Ok-- I'll be fair. I'm sure there are standalone Intel GPU's out there with PCI-X connectors. I never looked.

It's becoming more apparent in the last 3 months, that the GPL isn't about "Free Software", the GPL is about restricting what people can, and cannot, do with software licensed under it, even to the point of attempting to punish commercial vendors.

Apparently, the "option" you refer to is that people use an OS such as Windows, or OSX, if they're doing anything other than programming with their computer.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: random topic ;)
by thebluesgnr on Sun 14th May 2006 22:46 in reply to "RE[7]: random topic ;)"
thebluesgnr Member since:
2005-11-14

Well, that's a level of misunderstanding of the GPL I'm not letting slide.

The first freedom provided by the GPL is:

'The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).'

This means you're absolutely free to run any program you want on top of your Free operating system, free or proprietary.

What the the GPL restricts is your ability to restrict other people when you distribute software under the GPL. If you don't like it, simply don't distribute software under the GPL. The main problem here is not even with the GPL anyway, but the nVidia license.

And I'm sorry if I sound offensive but I have no idea what the hell you're talking about when you say I'm telling you not to use AMD CPU's. If you don't care about running non-free programs it doesn't matter to you, but the original poster I replied to does care (that's exactly what was asked). With AMD CPU's the choice of platform with free drivers is more limited, but still there are options available.

Reply Parent Score: 1