Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th May 2006 16:25 UTC, submitted by Michael Zandstra
Thread beginning with comment 125135
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I was expecting it as the "low end" Mac Mini got it, but was still hoping they wouldn't do it. I'm sure they are more expensive, but they've been able to do it in the past. Like I said, to me - going from "real" graphics cards like in the past, this is a step backwards. No, I don't game really at all, so its that aspect is not what I care about. RAM is a precious thing in OS X. I've got my 12" Powerbook G4 maxed out at 1.25GB with Tiger 10.4.6, and I was able to notice more lag with the stock 512MB. I can't imagine running with anything less.







Member since:
2005-07-09
Those things look awesome, but the killer of me ever owning one is that damn graphics "card" again. Shared memory sucks Apple! OS X needs as much RAM as it can get and taking away from teh system ram for video RAM is a step backwards from what you were doing before!