Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th May 2006 22:13 UTC, submitted by adstro
Thread beginning with comment 125594
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
Have you looked at the dependencies of GCJ compiled applications? Do an ldd of a generated executable and see all those libraries it links to. Is that going to be any smaller than just bundling the JRE with your program? Another thing people seem to be misinformed about is the assumption that GCJ will somehow speed Java up. It doesn't. Ever tried running the GCJ compiled version of Eclipse? Try it and then you'll run straight back to the Java version of Eclipse.