Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 28th May 2006 15:07 UTC, submitted by Valour
SoftwareInReview takes a look at SUSE 10.1, and summarizes: "While SUSE Linux 10.1 has lost some ground on its wonderful predecessor, I can see where it is headed in the future - and I like what I'm envisioning. A mildly buggy release like 10.1 was necessary in the big picture, unless of course Novell had opted to wait until issues with Atheros drivers, the ZENworks updater, and XGL were resolved. That would have resulted in a 'skipped' release, I think. Despite the trouble I had with 10.1, none of the problems were showstoppers, nor would they keep me from continuing to use and recommend SUSE Linux."
Thread beginning with comment 128988
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-02-05
but it does appear buggy, and I see the corporate Gnome-camp rot beginning to appear.
why wasn't Taskjuggler included in the default install?
why does Gnome have an easy-configure button for XGL and not KDE?
would 10.1 have been that much more stable if they had concentrated on KDE rather than try and have two great DE's?
let's see what happens with 10.2............