Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Aug 2005 17:36 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 12919
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
> When I think of KDE I think of encumbrance.
instead of asking "Why KDE" perhaps you should be asking, "why does my world view not match up with the reality of things that i am observing all around me?"
perhaps KDE really is more usable for the average user and doesn't introduce any licensing encumbrances that are of concern to anyone concerned with real world situations. that would explain things nicely, wouldn't it?
i'd also add that it could well be that the design of KDE resonates with the BSD people. perhaps the portability of KDE and the number of active KDE developers who use and develop on BSD has also had an impact on that community.
or maybe it's just all serendipity. at the end of the day the most important thing here is that more and more people are getting behind the open source desktop and putting their time and effort into promoting it.
this can only be a good thing.