To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Windows has supported headless operation since at least Windows 2000.
Not only that but they do have a CLI-only mode
I won't buy this. None of the Windows guru I met were ever able to do headless operation with any Windows.
Having a CLI-only mode does not mean "headless operation" is possible either.
I don't even know which magic protocol nobody knows about you can use to do "headless operation" on Windows : enlighten me please.
It's not. Do you seriously think that's a major issue? Even if their node setup runs it (which I'd doubt) it would be a tiny cost in memory and virtually no cost in cpu usage; unless you sit some idiot at the compute node to use it like a workstation.
The bigger concerns are probably things like rewriting software to work with Microsofts libraries, Windows NT's extremely heavy processes if you launch processes in your code, and if they haven't changed it on this, the 2GB limit on 32bit systems by default. And if their tcp/ip stack is as robust as it's supposed to be, now.






Member since:
2005-07-07
Typically, supercomputer applications are for ludicrous amounts of number crunching, right?
How was a WIMP (Windows, Icons, Mouse Pointer) interface helping the numbers crunch faster?