Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Jun 2006 13:43 UTC, submitted by Neal Freemen
Windows Microsoft has taken another step in its effort to bring Windows in the world of supercomputing, having finished development of its computer cluster operating system. It has finalized the code for Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003, which is designed to allow multiple servers to work together to handle high-performance computing (HPC) tasks. Such work, long handled by systems from SGI and Cray, has increasingly been tackled by Linux clusters, though Microsoft has been planning its entry for some time.
Thread beginning with comment 132654
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Not gonna work.
by smitty_one_each on Mon 12th Jun 2006 14:18 UTC in reply to "Not gonna work."
smitty_one_each
Member since:
2005-07-07

Typically, supercomputer applications are for ludicrous amounts of number crunching, right?
How was a WIMP (Windows, Icons, Mouse Pointer) interface helping the numbers crunch faster?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Not gonna work.
by CPUGuy on Mon 12th Jun 2006 14:34 in reply to "RE: Not gonna work."
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

Windows has supported headless operation since at least Windows 2000.

Not only that but they do have a CLI-only mode.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Not gonna work.
by Ookaze on Mon 12th Jun 2006 14:53 in reply to "RE[2]: Not gonna work."
Ookaze Member since:
2005-11-14

Windows has supported headless operation since at least Windows 2000.
Not only that but they do have a CLI-only mode


I won't buy this. None of the Windows guru I met were ever able to do headless operation with any Windows.
Having a CLI-only mode does not mean "headless operation" is possible either.
I don't even know which magic protocol nobody knows about you can use to do "headless operation" on Windows : enlighten me please.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: Not gonna work.
by celt on Mon 12th Jun 2006 21:48 in reply to "RE[2]: Not gonna work."
celt Member since:
2005-07-06

"Not only that but they do have a CLI-only mode."

Yeah that's right, didn't they call it "gonad" or something similar? Claiming it to better than anything from the UNIX folks.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Not gonna work.
by ma_d on Tue 13th Jun 2006 03:43 in reply to "RE: Not gonna work."
ma_d Member since:
2005-06-29

It's not. Do you seriously think that's a major issue? Even if their node setup runs it (which I'd doubt) it would be a tiny cost in memory and virtually no cost in cpu usage; unless you sit some idiot at the compute node to use it like a workstation.

The bigger concerns are probably things like rewriting software to work with Microsofts libraries, Windows NT's extremely heavy processes if you launch processes in your code, and if they haven't changed it on this, the 2GB limit on 32bit systems by default. And if their tcp/ip stack is as robust as it's supposed to be, now.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Not gonna work.
by Marcellus on Tue 13th Jun 2006 10:37 in reply to "RE[2]: Not gonna work."
Marcellus Member since:
2005-08-26

and if they haven't changed it on this, the 2GB limit on 32bit systems by default.

The Computer Cluster Server 2003 is only available as 64bit according to MicroSoft, but I'm sure you know better.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1