Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Jun 2006 15:36 UTC, submitted by user123
"Network attached storage has been known to Unix users for a very long time with NFS. NFS is reliable, performs well on the performance front, but it is infamous for its security. The biggest problem with NFS is that the client is responsible for controlling user file access. The NFS server just accepts file system operations on behalf of a given UID and enforces nearly no control. NFS require you trust your clients, something that may not be adequate. Andrew File System is an alternative network file system. In this interview, I ask Ty Sarna about his experience with AFS. Ty Sarna has been an AFS user since 1992 and is a NetBSD developer since 1998."
Thread beginning with comment 134049
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-15
yes, i have an embedded dhcp+http/ftp-proxy which pxeboots a ramdiskkernel that sets up ipsec+afs and fetches userland from compact flash, solely for putting logs and some configuration files which i need to change without any hassle, on a centralized afs cache. it's sheer convenience