Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Jun 2006 15:36 UTC, submitted by user123
NetBSD "Network attached storage has been known to Unix users for a very long time with NFS. NFS is reliable, performs well on the performance front, but it is infamous for its security. The biggest problem with NFS is that the client is responsible for controlling user file access. The NFS server just accepts file system operations on behalf of a given UID and enforces nearly no control. NFS require you trust your clients, something that may not be adequate. Andrew File System is an alternative network file system. In this interview, I ask Ty Sarna about his experience with AFS. Ty Sarna has been an AFS user since 1992 and is a NetBSD developer since 1998."
Thread beginning with comment 134217
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
apples/ oranges
by xxmf on Fri 16th Jun 2006 15:20 UTC
Member since:

I may be off base here but afs has different semantics (coherency) and thus 'can' overcome
certain deficiencies that nfs has....

Reply Score: 2