Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 16th Jun 2006 20:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 134486
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Grammar correction...
by biteydog on Sun 18th Jun 2006 10:14
in reply to "RE[2]: Grammar correction..."
Eats, Shoots and Leaves, citing Fowler's Modern English Usage, tells us an 's is required after modern names ending in S. The only an apostrophe after an S rule is used for the plurals of nouns, not for modern names, at least not as a matter of principal....
Yes, AFAIK both are correct usage (in UK English anyway) - with an exception for Jesus' which according to Lynn Fowler cannot be Jesus's. (I'm omitting quotes to avoid confusion here.)
BTW it's "principle", not "principal" in this context!
Gosh, I'm picky today 






Member since:
2005-10-06
"The first is awkward, but since it's a contraction for "Gates is", it's correct. The second is a possessive, but the correction for that should be "Gates'"..."
Actually they're both possessive, stepping back is a gerund (the -ing form of a verb used as a noun). They are also both correct. Lynn Truss's punctuation book, Eats, Shoots and Leaves, citing Fowler's Modern English Usage, tells us an 's is required after modern names ending in S. The only an apostrophe after an S rule is used for the plurals of nouns, not for modern names, at least not as a matter of principal.
This whole area, the possessive apostrophe with modern names ending in S is indicated to be subject to stylistic choices more than absolute rules, so "Bill Gates' company Microsoft" and "Bill Gates's company Microsoft" are both acceptable.