Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Jun 2006 21:07 UTC, submitted by phandley
Apple "When one takes the seamless integration, stability, ease of use, quality engineering, the TCO, and the ability to boot Windows, one can easily conclude that a Mac is not necessarily a more expensive proposition. The argument that Mac's are too expensive no longer applies. Although you can spend between $600 and several thousand for a Mac, stay within your means and purchase a system that meets your computing demands."
Thread beginning with comment 136764
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Cheap shot
by rayiner on Sat 24th Jun 2006 15:13 UTC in reply to "RE: Cheap shot"
rayiner
Member since:
2005-07-06

It's a cheap shot because it blows the whole "Apple defect" thing out of proportion. I've got three Macs in the house (an iMac CD, a DC PowerMac, and a Macbook), and they all run flawlessly. Meanwhile, the two PCs left in the house* all have some level of weirdness. When the PCs are acting up, do you know what my family does? They go use the iMac, because its always working. Hell, it works more reliably than our toaster, which burns Eggo waffles randomly.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1