Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Jun 2006 11:48 UTC, submitted by RJay
Microsoft WinFS seems to have been cancelled-- sort of. "These changes do mean that we are not pursuing a separate delivery of WinFS, including the previously planned Beta 2 release. With most of our effort now working towards productizing mature aspects of the WinFS project into SQL and ADO.NET, we do not need to deliver a separate WinFS offering."
Thread beginning with comment 137011
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: It's basically dead.
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 25th Jun 2006 12:45 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: It's basically dead."
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

WinFS was meant to be an object-oriented, relational filesystem to be run on top of a real filesystem.

I always thought it was a sort of database running on top of NTFS. Check the line I quoted from your post, doesn't 'database' fit in better there?

Also, where in the article does it say WinFS is a filesystem? I can't seem to find it-- however, might be me being stupid.

Edited 2006-06-25 12:45

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: It's basically dead.
by dylansmrjones on Sun 25th Jun 2006 12:53 in reply to "RE[3]: It's basically dead."
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

It is a sort of database.

But it's also a sort of high-level FS running on top of a low-level FS.

It's a database-like FS-extension.

Am I getting closer to something you can recognize?

The article does not directly use the word "filesystem" but I've always considered WinFS to be a high-level object-oriented, relational file system. So the 4th paragraph sort of points it out for me. Phrases like "richer store", "storage innovations" are what I consider part of a high-level FS.

It fits into what I've learned about FS. The classical Mac FS is a rich storage FS.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: It's basically dead.
by sappyvcv on Sun 25th Jun 2006 13:09 in reply to "RE[4]: It's basically dead."
sappyvcv Member since:
2005-07-06

How come the developers have said before that it's not a file system then?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[6]: It's basically dead.
by grrr on Sun 25th Jun 2006 18:41 in reply to "RE[4]: It's basically dead."
grrr Member since:
2005-09-03

That is probably why it is dead. Nobody knows what it is for or what problem it solves even the developers.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1