OSNews > Thread > "RE[7]: It's basically dead." by dylansmrjones

Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Jun 2006 11:48 UTC, submitted by RJay

WinFS seems to have been cancelled-- sort of. "These changes do mean that we are not pursuing a separate delivery of WinFS, including the previously planned Beta 2 release. With most of our effort now working towards productizing mature aspects of the WinFS project into SQL and ADO.NET, we do not need to deliver a separate WinFS offering."

0 47 Comment(s)

http://osne.ws/bkf

Thread beginning with comment 137019
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.

RE[7]: It's basically dead.

by dylansmrjones on Sun 25th Jun 2006 13:16 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: It's basically dead."

Member since:
2005-10-02

It does to me, though.

You ought to read Gary Nutt's "Operating Systems".
It would explain how it's possible.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[8]: It's basically dead.

by sappyvcv on Sun 25th Jun 2006 13:19 in reply to "RE[7]: It's basically dead."

Member since:
2005-07-06

So the developers call it an extension to NTFS but you and some guy with the last name "Nutt" want to call it a file system.

Hmmmmm

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: -1

RE[9]: It's basically dead.

by dylansmrjones on Sun 25th Jun 2006 13:26 in reply to "RE[8]: It's basically dead."

Member since:
2005-10-02

I also call it an extension.

But the developers also call it a high-level rich storage file system. Thom calls it a sort-of-database.

None of it is wrong.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1