Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 26th Jun 2006 22:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 137543
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Microsoft never badmouthed FOSS
by kaiwai on Tue 27th Jun 2006 07:35
in reply to "RE: Microsoft never badmouthed FOSS"
It would be nice for Hilf to define what "most" is and on what basis did he collate his information, in respects to a 'code sample' to come to that conclusion. Did he wonder through freshmeat, grab a whole heap of alpha projects, threw them together and claimed that to be the benchmark of OSS software?
Good gracious; one doesn't need to look far for quality opensource software; Apache, Netbeans, GCC, the GNU userland stack, KDE, Xorg, *BSD's, Azeurus, Firefox, Amarok etc. etc.
I have no worries with this Hilf charactor having a say on opensource software vs. his company, but lets keep to the facts rather than trying to make gross generalisations on this he seems to know *VERY* little about.




Member since:
2006-01-24
Microsoft did bad mouth Open Source...
"The magic of open-source software is not the software. It has nothing to do with the code at all. Most open-source code is terribly inferior to commercial software code," Hilf said.
This from an osnews article from a couple of days ago.