Linked by Eugenia Loli on Thu 29th Jun 2006 01:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 138498
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
"Yes, because they are different OSes. I am not asking in my article to have ALL cellphones to be compatible. I am asking the LINUX-based cellphones to be compatible."
Why not? If Joe User don't care what OS his phone runs he would also want compatibility regardless of OS.
"And for Linux to play a ROLE in that future, it MUST be compatible with its incarnations."
Linux is. It's the customized API's and extra stuff that isn't but that has *NOTHING* to do with Linux and everything to do with the manufacturer of the device.
It also doesn't really have anything to do with Linux "future" in the field. If Linux continues to work well for the manufacturers it will have a future. If it it doesn't, it will be gone.
Oh yeah, and "Linux" in itself doesn't really have any interest in being a market leader or anything in the mobile space.