To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Palm would strongly dispute this argument, as the ability to customize aps to an industry is one of the stronger selling points of PalmOS based phones.
So it's popularity that is causing Palm to dump PalmOS in favor of WinMob. See, I thought it was a near lack of market penetration. Not that WinMob has any market penetration to speak of, but at least WinMob isn't quite the horror show that PalmOS is.
Nice selective quoting. Especially the part where you left out the explanation of why Palm is "dumping" PalmOS in favor of WinMob.
Care to explain the Treo 700P if Palm is "dumping" PalmOS ?
Palm is hedging its bets because PalmSource is failing in its attempts to update PalmOS, as I've already pointed out. But whether it uses WinMob or PalmOS, the reality is still that its market penetration is because of corporate customers that want more than just the "blackberry experience" and do want to be able to install industry-specific aps on smartphones.




Member since:
2006-02-15
Wrong, wrong wrong. Corporate buyers want a Blackberry's functionality. The ability to install applications doesn't even come up on their radar.
Palm would strongly dispute this argument, as the ability to customize aps to an industry is one of the stronger selling points of PalmOS based phones.
If any of that mattered huge platforms like PalmOS wouldn't be suddenly killed. Handset makers would, at least within their own line, standardize on a platform.
PalmOS hasn't been "suddenly killed." PalmSource has slowly bled it to death by not providing a reasonable update in over 5 years.
Handset makers are moving to standarize on a platform within their own line. Both Nokia and Motorola have extensive in-house programs to reduce the number of platforms.