To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're quite right - on the platforms that nVidia do support - the support, related to thair closed drivers, are really good.
But apart from that - they're closed. If you prefer open source drivers or if you use another platform - you're on your own. No specs (not even recent 2D specs - even under NDA), no nothing.
But apart from that - they're closed. If you prefer open source drivers or if you use another platform - you're on your own. No specs (not even recent 2D specs - even under NDA), no nothing.
That's different from ATi how? Seriously, nVidia and ATi are the only two serious options for high-performance, high-quality 3D acceleration. While I wholeheartedly wish that they would provide this information. Faulting nVidia for something that is industry standard practice is getting old.
This isn't just a problem with the graphics card industry either. It's a problem with the hardware manufacturing industry as a whole.






Member since:
2005-12-27
NVIDIA at least is very supportive about Open Source projects not like ATI that does not care for other OS but for Windoze. I think it is a step to the right direction since a collaborative job between them will lead to a better NVIDIA and freeBSD future. I have used freeBSD for some time and NVIDIA isn't as good quality as in Linux for the freeBSD. But I give kudos to the NVIDIA people always heading towards the right cause.
.
Note: I use WIndoze term not for trolling just because I don't like to use the true name which implies using a (tm) after it