Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Aug 2005 20:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 13913
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
iMovie is much more capable than Movie Maker (I kanow, I have used both.)
GB has the capability to be used as a place to lay down midi tracks from your board. you canb then mix them and put nice effects on them.
a band could actualy use garageband to create an album (like you know, a highschool garageband)
Acid Xpress is NOT like garageband in almost every way.




Member since:
> These are applications for Burning DVDs (and CDs) not making a DVD.
The part of Nero that does authoring is called NeroVision Express and is included in OEM bundles.
> Movie Maker's video editing capeabilities are more akin to QuickTime Pro's.
iMovie is a low end movie editor for home users. It's not much more capable than WMM2.
> Garageband is not a sequencer. Well, it can sequence audio, but its not a sequencer. An appropriate comparitive application is fruity loops.
In Acid XPress you can also create tracks by painting prerecorded loops on a roll. Why do you suppose it's so different from GB?