To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How can it be anarchy when I want laws and authorities to secure those laws are not broken?
The rest of your reply is not worthy to my time. You still haven't quoted me even once for saying there shouldn't be any laws at all.
You have misquoted me several times though.
So, with all due respect. I am your superior. It's not arrogance. It's just a fact.
> So, with all due respect. I am your superior. It's not arrogance.
> It's just a fact.
Ok.. you are officially one of the most ARROGANT assholes I have ever had the displeasure of running into. I'm surprised you don't pass out considering your ego is somewhere up in the ionosphere.
You are only superior in your own mind. And the fact that you think you are, is why you are so wrong on so many things. Cause you refuse to admit you don't know nearly as much as you think you do. And that's why you are so good at being so wrong.







Member since:
2005-10-08
> If what you have written today is an evidence of
> your knowledge of economics
At least I didn't make make the "survival of the fittest claim" to prove that I buy into the common misconception of ecomonics that real economists know is not really the case. You however, did prove you buy into that misconception, and were not familar with the game theory models that prove it doesn't work that way in reality.
> I've met many persons with graduate degrees
> in various fields, and so far I haven't met one
> in economics or politics that can outwit me.
Ah. Well, thanks for clearing that up. So yeah, you really are just that arrogant. You think you know more about econoics and politics than people who specialized it in and went to school for years to obtains graduate degrees in those fields.
Sorry. I really can't stand this kind of arrogance.
> You need to unlearn before you understand, I'm afraid.
On the contrary. You need to learn more before you understand. Such as you need to learn the game theory models that prove your simplistic "surivival of the fittest" ideas just don't happen in reality.
> No it's not anarchy
Yes it is. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...
Edited 2006-07-02 05:28