Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Jul 2006 17:21 UTC, submitted by bmeurer
Thread beginning with comment 141708
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You can quote numbers all you like, but XFCE is not as light as it used to be. One thing that explains it being lighter is gnome-vfs which comes with a lot of functionality and Thunar lacks this, Xarchiver is just a clone of file-rollers.
Take gnome-vfs and gconf out of the loop and nautilus would be no different to Thunar, after all thats all it is really.






Member since:
2006-03-12
From beta1
PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
15 0 83172 10m 9068 S 0.0 1.4 0:00.89 xfdesktop
15 0 10308 4152 3580 S 0.0 0.5 0:00.07 xfce4-session
15 0 79064 8260 6328 S 0.0 1.1 0:01.14 xfce4-panel
15 0 81460 10m 8576 S 0.0 1.4 0:01.19 xfce4-menu-plug
15 0 88732 8084 5692 S 0.0 1.0 0:00.36 xfce-mcs-manage