Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Jul 2006 20:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 141835
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The comparison is still valid, though.
Several of the features that VMware has that Parallels lacks are currently experimental, and it's not entirely reasonable to expect Parallels to have those features in a first release.
One thing I would expect is the ability to virtualize OSX when running on a Mac, but I see no indication that it's possible to do so. That should be the focus of the next release, even if you can only do so on the OSX version.




Member since:
2005-07-12
VMware has *experimental* support for 3D acceleration and SMP for the guest OS, as well as support for 64-bit guests (not for me though. My athlon isn't new enough).
Also, it's vm tools run on Windows, Linux, and FreeBSD. Plus X.Org has a vmware driver, so Solaris, NetBSD, etc etc have decent video support.
USB has worked great for me, and though I haven't tried, I suspect VMware can't use my burner, though I'd imagine a USB one would work.
You can also use your serial and parallel ports, and you can attatch any scsi device you have directly to the guest. Raw disks also work.
VMware (Windows host) has also never crashed on me, even when abusing multiple guest OS's.
DOS games run like crap, as only basic VESA support is included. Your much better off playing your dos game straight in XP. DosBox is even cooler.
For networking, VMware can share the connection, use a NAT setup, or be networked only with the host (and other VM's if you put them on the same virtual network). With Windows guests, you can just drag files from the host into the VMware window and drop files on desktop, and vice versa. Also, when you resize the your vmware window, a Windows guest will change resolutions to accomodate.
The best part is it's snapshots. You can take snapshots at any point, and even branch off from previous snapshots and do something else. I've found that infinately useful.
Based on the article, VMware is leaps and bounds ahead. Of course, it also costs much more.