Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jul 2006 17:15 UTC, submitted by Lakedaemon
Thread beginning with comment 142101
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I more and more like SkyOS
by kaiwai on Wed 12th Jul 2006 05:23
in reply to "RE: I more and more like SkyOS"
Maybe once SkyOS gets critical mass, Robert might opensource it; right now, the only way to make money, given the very small user base, is to keep it closed source; I'm sure once there are 100,000 users, and 10% of them paying $10 per release, he'll cover his costs, but until such a day occurs, I don't see it being opensource.
As for Roberts contribution; as far as I see it, he is giving back in terms of the port to SkyOS of the compiler, the changes and bug fixes he probably needed to make etc. Giving back to the community isn't always adding new features.






Member since:
2005-08-22
I used to be a big fan of this OS around the time they had the "UI Redesign" contest a few years ago.
Since then, they've had years of paid betas and not much else. Everything exciting about this project has been pretty much squandered. I mean, not to take anything from Robert, he's a hell of a programmer, but Sky is no longer an OS i would consider using.
And what makes it worse is the increased reliance on GPL tools. At first, Sky had a lot of critism for using GPL software, and many accused Robert of violating the GPL as the only explanation for the quick development of the system. At the time, i thought those people were being ridiculous, but now its become crystal clear how indebt Sky is to Free software even if it is not a GPL violation. And there's nothing Free (in any sense of the word) about SkyOS.
As a hobby project, Sky is still notable, but Gnu/Linux is really where the action is.