Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 12th Jul 2006 16:18 UTC, submitted by wakeupneo
Thread beginning with comment 142414
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Goes with gusto. . .
by DrillSgt on Wed 12th Jul 2006 22:14
in reply to "RE[5]: Goes with gusto. . ."
"So what you're saying is that Microsoft doesn't charge Dell anything for the Windows license?
I find the alternative explanation - that Microsoft has prevailed upon Dell to sell the FreeDOS-equipped PCs at an artificially inflated price in order to reduce their attractiveness - rather more likely."
No, that is not what I said or was saying. Microsoft does charge dell for a license. All I was saying is that there is no difference in price for a PC with or without. Please don't read into what I write, but rather exactly what it says. Webster's English Dictionary is a wonderful thing, unless you are a lawyer in which case I suppose you can make up your own meanings as you go.
RE[7]: Goes with gusto. . .
by AdamW on Thu 13th Jul 2006 00:03
in reply to "RE[6]: Goes with gusto. . ."







Member since:
2005-07-06
So what you're saying is that Microsoft doesn't charge Dell anything for the Windows license?
I find the alternative explanation - that Microsoft has prevailed upon Dell to sell the FreeDOS-equipped PCs at an artificially inflated price in order to reduce their attractiveness - rather more likely.