Linked by Steffen Liebergeld on Thu 13th Jul 2006 17:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 142827
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: This is interesting...
by steffen on Fri 14th Jul 2006 10:29
in reply to "This is interesting..."
The performance is slightly worse than plain Linux because of the overhead of more context switches.
In fact, we published a paper about the performance of microkernels, by comparing L4linux on Fiasco, plain Linux and Linux on Mach. The conclusion is that the overhead "can be kept somewhere between 5% and 10% for applications". You may read the paper here:
http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/pubs/sosp97/
"Performance of µ-Kernel-based Systems"
Virtualization is possible in the sense that you may run more than one L4Linux instance on top of the L4 microkernel. You should make sure that those instances use distinct drivers for hardware, to avoid collisions;-).
RE[2]: This is interesting...
by Tuishimi on Fri 14th Jul 2006 16:31
in reply to "RE: This is interesting..."






Member since:
2005-07-06
...So, are the goals mostly security-related? Is the performance really any better than the standard Linux kernel?
Would this be useful in virtualization?