Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Jul 2006 21:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 144781
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
My thoughts exactly. IHMO, all of the most recent mainstream Linux distributions are incredibly excellent. When I started using Linux (Red Hat 6.2), I couldn't even imagine that they'd ever get this good. The free software movement has fought a hardware industry that's largely unwilling to cooperate and the restrictive licensing of proprietary software vendors. In spite of these obstables, they've still been able to achieve the vast majority of that smooth, polished experience that I thought would be plain impossible to achieve.
There's still major obstacles to Linux-based operating systems becoming accepted and supported by the computer industry at large. However, with every hurdle that the free software community overcomes, it becomes that much easier for the industry to meet us by knocking some down from their side. With the quality, breadth, and value offered by distributions like Ubuntu, it must be getting hard for some in the industry to answer the question, "Why not?"