Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sat 22nd Jul 2006 21:15 UTC
Linux Toby Richards wrote an opinion article for NewsForge, claiming that for him, Linux won't get mainstream until Evolution - or another capable Outlook-like client - gets optimized and offers 100% compatibility with Exchange. In the comments section of Newsforge readers offered more reasons as to why Linux is not mainstream, offering a view on their needs. My take: While for my personal, home usage of Linux my needs are different, I agree with Toby that companies won't switch their desktops if full Exchange compatibility isn't reached and if Evolution stops being the memory beast it currently is.
Thread beginning with comment 145397
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Alternatives
by Eugenia on Sat 22nd Jul 2006 21:44 UTC in reply to "RE: Alternatives"
Eugenia
Member since:
2005-06-28

My husband's company of over 1000 employees are using Exchange, not Domino. The company is unix-friendly (many of their dev systems are running solaris, freebsd or linux), but they would not consider moving their desktops to linux without a good Exchange client. You see, their desktops are all running Windows...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Alternatives
by dotMatt on Sun 23rd Jul 2006 02:29 in reply to "RE[2]: Alternatives"
dotMatt Member since:
2005-07-29

Why waste time trying to become Exchange compliant, if the community is trying to squash Exchange? Why not instead work to create a server-side Outlook-compatibile Exchange replacement? Linux has been better accepted server side than client side, so leverage that acceptance with a server side replacement. Then, there is no more "must be Exchange compatibile" argument against moving the clients.

Note my personal belief here - I believe a company with majority Windows admins is not ready for Linux desktops (who supports the desktops? and their interactions with the servers?). A company with majority *nix admins is ready for Linux desktops.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Alternatives
by twickline on Sun 23rd Jul 2006 08:35 in reply to "RE[2]: Alternatives"
twickline Member since:
2005-12-31

Well there is a solution out there and i'm sure 99.99% of the regular readers here know what it is.. right?

http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=1498637333

"The best way to ensure 100 per cent compatibility with Exchange/Outlook features is to run Outlook itself. Crossover Office from Codeweavers (http://www.codeweavers.com) allows you to do just this. "

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Alternatives
by Cloudy on Sun 23rd Jul 2006 19:48 in reply to "RE[3]: Alternatives"
Cloudy Member since:
2006-02-15

"The best way to ensure 100 per cent compatibility with Exchange/Outlook features is to run Outlook itself. Crossover Office from Codeweavers (http://www.codeweavers.com) allows you to do just this."


From the codeweaver web site:

*1 - Outlook 2003 is not supported.

You were saying?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3