Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 22nd Jul 2006 21:15 UTC
Linux Toby Richards wrote an opinion article for NewsForge, claiming that for him, Linux won't get mainstream until Evolution - or another capable Outlook-like client - gets optimized and offers 100% compatibility with Exchange. In the comments section of Newsforge readers offered more reasons as to why Linux is not mainstream, offering a view on their needs. My take: While for my personal, home usage of Linux my needs are different, I agree with Toby that companies won't switch their desktops if full Exchange compatibility isn't reached and if Evolution stops being the memory beast it currently is.
Thread beginning with comment 145448
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: more reasons...
by astroraptor on Sun 23rd Jul 2006 03:26 UTC in reply to "RE: more reasons..."
astroraptor
Member since:
2005-07-22

My God ... these articles never cease do they? Well, thankfully there's less and less comments on them, so I guess these articles are fading away.

Listen, if Linux really is God's only son as many of you deem it with your heart and soul, then most people would actually use it. They really would. I mean, does every kid and his dog use Windows Media Player? No. A lot of people use WinAMP, a lot of inept computer users too. It's not hard to go and download it and use it. Does everyone use MSN Messenger? No. Once again, a lot of people use AIM, amongst others. Where am I going with this? Windows has programs that are preinstalled which many in the Linux community like to believe that people couldn't be arsed to try anything else. Given, this is true for some, but consider those who use 3rd party applications and tools, and there are many. I mean, Windows comes with a word processor built-in, a photo-editor (of sorts ;) ), a media player, a web browser, etc etc. Do people use them? A lot of people do but choices are available, and an OS with little hardware/software support and configuration which is difficult to many is not the answer.

So why isn't Linux mainstream? It's been mentioned time and time again and it's going through one ear and out the other or some lame excuse for a rebuttle follows.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: more reasons...
by somebody on Sun 23rd Jul 2006 19:21 in reply to "RE[2]: more reasons..."
somebody Member since:
2005-07-07

My God ... these articles never cease do they? Well, thankfully there's less and less comments on them, so I guess these articles are fading away.

??? Since you obviously didn't understand my point. I wasn't disputing article (read my other answer to the original parent to get a clearer picture), I disputed stupid reasons, not even one was valid.

Listen, if Linux really is God's only son as many of you deem it with your heart and soul, then most people would actually use it.

Now go trough all of my history and try to find one single point where I would be saying what you claim I am.

There are valid reasons, and there are stupid reasons. Parent post had stupid reasons, so I disputed them. Or, did I fought a holly war with all the posts saying contra linux?

Reply Parent Score: -1